Modi government demolished another mosque in Uttar Pradesh as opposition alleges crackdown on Muslims
By The South Asia Times
LUCKNOW, India - Authorities in India’s Uttar Pradesh state demolished a mosque inside the Saharanpur District Magistrate’s office complex early Saturday after getting an order from a local court, triggering protests from opposition politicians of an increasingly heavy-handed approach toward Muslim religious sites.
The demolition was carried out under heavy security after a district court on Friday dismissed an appeal by the mosque management committee against an earlier local administration order for its removal.
The Modi government, using the local administration, described the mosque as an unauthorized structure occupying government property and then demolished it, according to local Muslim leaders.
Samajwadi Party lawmaker Iqra Hasan, who represents the Kairana constituency in the area, said she was placed under house arrest at her residence as the demolition operation was carried out.
Hasan said residents and local leaders had wanted additional time to approach the Allahabad High Court, but said the local Hindu officials prevented her from travelling to Saharanpur to join Muslims leaders and stopped the demolition. She said hundreds of people had gathered and wanted to seek legal relief before the mosque was demolished.
“The manner in which this action was executed demonstrates how democracy has been murdered,” Hasan said. She said the matter would be challenged in court.
The MP also questioned the need for a judicial system if government decisions could effectively be implemented without allowing people time to seek further legal remedies.
Her allegations of house arrest were also reported by multiple Indian outlets, while police and local authorities said the demolition followed the court process.
The Saharanpur case follows several other mosque demolitions in Uttar Pradesh in recent years, most of them involving government allegations that the structures were built on public land or constituted encroachments.
In April 2025, the Uttar Pradesh government said at least 20 mosques and madrasas within 15 kilometres of the India-Nepal border had been removed as part of an anti-encroachment campaign.
In 2026, authorities also demolished or ordered the removal of mosques in districts including Sambhal, Lucknow and Sitapur, citing alleged occupation of government or public land. In one case in Lucknow, a mosque said to have existed for decades was demolished after the Allahabad High Court rejected a challenge to the administration's action.
Indian Muslims accused the Indian courts of also apparently supporting the government's moves to demolish the mosque, as always upholding the administration's decisions.
A separate controversy has emerged in neighbouring Moradabad over the prosecution of Samajwadi Party district vice president Haji Mohammad Usman, who was accused of offering Muslim prayers at the Circuit House. Police registered a case under sections 285 and 292 of India's Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, relating to obstruction or danger in a public way and public nuisance.
Local reports said a video circulated on social media showed Usman praying near the Circuit House grounds. Usman said he had committed no wrongdoing and that he prayed when the time for worship arrived, while authorities said the matter was being investigated.
The developments have renewed political debate over the treatment of Muslim religious sites in Uttar Pradesh, India's most populous state and one governed by the Bharatiya Janata Party. Supporters of the demolitions say authorities are enforcing land and building laws without discrimination, while opposition parties and Muslim leaders argue that enforcement has disproportionately affected the community and that affected people should be given adequate opportunity to pursue legal remedies.
The latest Saharanpur demolition is therefore likely to become another flashpoint in India's continuing debate over religious freedom, property rights and the use of demolition drives by state authorities.