Dark Mode
Wednesday, 16 July 2025
Logo
AdSense Advertisement
Advertisement
The Industrial Trap: Old Age Home and New Excuses

The Industrial Trap: Old Age Home and New Excuses

A nation’s economic structure, shaped by its unique domestic characteristics and geological influences, creates a broad foundation for political achievements and policy development. This evolving landscape supports the growth of a capable economy that drives social progress through a strategic industrialization system, effectively utilizing national resources to develop diverse industries. Maintaining a balance between local and international markets is a key factor in industrialization, ensuring that each stage of development aligns with economic policies and long-term stability.

The traditional features of most countries are comparatively influenced due to the lack of considering such factors. In 1950-60 the average share of agriculture was 3.2 percent of the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) during 1960-80 the share decreased by 2.6 percent of the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) while in industry the respective share was 6.6 and 6.4 percent. In 1966 a worker engaged in the industry produced an output of times bigger than agriculture however the developing countries with such opportunities were yet Least Developed Countries LDCs during the same period which pushed them back from the International Politics instead of securing best place on the stage of Global Governance.

Nevertheless, foreign exchange reserve were not so exhausted which enabled them to big industrial materials and machinery to import for the local market development at the existing capacity and building of new enterprises though this showed the increased and some raw materials which allowed the big expansion of Oil, the share of which in total industrial went up from 5.6 percent to 18.6 percent, and without the extractive industry of Oil dropped from 12.6 to 4.5 percent of the total amount of GDP.

Meanwhile the Raw Materials by itself cannot ensure the development of national economy as whole instead promotes economic independency especially when the natural wealth is exploited by foreign wealth. All these were the real time problems of the countries in Asia and Latin America which are closely linked with the uneven sectorial building up of industry in all developing countries. The population growths worsen the situation and warned the influenced countries by the importing some raw materials during 1955-68 twice of the commodities’ price. However the possibilities of the country to import some goods for population are largely depended upon how the food requirements are satisfied by its own agriculture.

All these affected the urbanization with contagious solutions as a result the labor market was sophisticated with decrease of wages which consequently lead to unemployment. In countries like India and Burma the rate of unemployment rose by twice of the population each time. Although mineral resource can be considered a harsh reality of assets for difficult times to recover the reserves and make it possible for us to involve in the international politics. However to certain extent the introduction of new industrial products at the time likewise cotton, food (chews and other fruits) by developing countries was an effort to offset the decrease of demand for goods. In fact, the question is decided either by shifting the burden of solution to the spontaneous market mechanism or the disjoint political and economic measures? Nonetheless by the upper class state owned enterprises in the government can determine the trends proportions and rates of new construction in the public sector and plan the modernization and enlargement of existing enterprises. In which is urgent need of good policy makers and so on to the labors though the absences of the unsatisfied salaries and wants of the public enterprises is an important reason for Brian Drain in the public sector.


With the monopolistic completion in capital-intensive sectors, where developed countries maintains the capital accumulation, trade strategies, institutional supports, development of other sectors and financial reforms (one of the basic need for better economic infrastructure) of under developing countries which is ultimately conspiracy of progressive political system upon the stage of Global Governance yet with the balanced policy intervention instead of geographical proximity to the developing countries by advanced states can provide a better solution than bitter without any contagious policies to achieve the required place in the international politics. The industrialization was meant to empower Least Developed Countries, as global trade is supposed to create equal opportunities. Instead, underdeveloped nations remain stuck exporting raw materials, while wealthier nations dominate high-value production.

Trade agreements and foreign direct investment (FDI) benefit rich countries disproportionately, just like the new problems Digital Divide & AI Economy; The Public Health Crisis, The Renewable Energy Transition meanwhile particularly Climate policies favors them. Providing the climate crises as a lens to the industrial problems we may be remain the same as we were in the industrial way to this era in which we are in the same struggle but with different shapes which remains the urgent problem for the states persons.

As for instance industrialization according to studies has driven the environmental changes particularly the climate change with an urgent problem of greenhouse gas emissions however which are yet to be confirmed by climatologists instead of environmentalists although we might be considering the environmentalists predictions. Moreover the Industrial Revolution set the stage for long term polices and implications which is becoming a political tool rather than just an environmental issue. Politicians with business mindset and corporations monetize the climate policies rather than addressing the root problems which are yet to be confirmed despite underdeveloped countries.

Although in this race (capitalism) it is obvious that rich get richer and poor remains in poverty which is ultimately a war (economic inequality leading to injustices giving birth to evils), as underdeveloped nations struggle with the industrialization while facing climate regulations and other sectorial problems likewise the need of the day Technology that slow down the progress in their way to development.

The Earth's climate has changed since the Industrial Revolution as per the climatologists and environmental analysts. After the industrial revolution, the Green House emissions and the human activities emissions rate were in the same rhythm per year. The fluctuation in the temperature was also in the same rhythm, these rhythms were only interpreted during two most of the warming periods which occurred during the two periods from 1910 to 1945 and the second period from 1976 to 2000.

It is estimated that during these periods the greenhouse emissions due to human activities and industries were 25% and 80% respectively, which is comparatively high to the Industrial Revolution during these two repeated warming periods. Perhaps this shows that the climate depends upon the time scale. Also further before the next wave of climate in this discourse, the indications are somehow relevant to the wars.

1945 was the era in which World War II encrypted with the beginnings of great energy emissions also before World War II there was another World War (1) which also indicates the energy emissions were comparatively low to World War II. For instance, it is not due to the greenhouse and human daily activities but it seems to be part of wars. In World War II nuclear weapons were used in different places from different areas which can satisfy the locational purpose of climate change.

However it is predicted that from 1990 to 2100 there will be an increase in the temperature and CO2 emission to 20 billion tones from 7 billion, also Harvard Environmental Department on Climate estimated that it might be 21 billion tones from 7 billion tones. If the emissions remain at this current rate does it will have a short-run effect on the temperature? In recent natural experiments instrumental variables approach to estimate the short-run temperature effect of emission without adopting any particular model of long-run persistence, we estimated that ten years of emissions at the current rate would increase the temperature over those ten years by 0.13 degrees Celsius (Montenual & stock), a complex report by Harvard environment economic program.

Thus the wars and industrial revaluations have almost covered the ten years gases capacity in the atmosphere within three to four years which shows the exact amount of capacity in the atmosphere, which allows the human mind to think smart and talk faster as you have been using your capacity from last 20 to 25 years. Climate change has diversified into a business for billionaires and millionaires, a political issue for statesmen, an economics problem for economists, a health problem for healthcare professionals, an administrative problem for managers, an investment opportunity for investors, and a source of amusement for master minds thus all are at the one stage to contribute in climate change with different political strategies. Moreover, as per the analysts climate change will affect these three areas of interest, agriculture, water supply, and temperature.

Ultimately, the administrative structure of each country will have a wider investment in climate change to balance the nature of two natural entities humans and the environment. For me, the one thing that is obvious about climate change is that there will never be enough money to meet the demands of the world's most vulnerable populations; every single person will help every other single person. The ecosystem will become the same for both rich and poor according to climate experts, but is in a matter of fact, rich people are always seen as rich as there is no justice in the world thus the rich will get richer while the poor will stay in the poverty stage without progressing.

In fact, developing countries are pushed the same way to adopt the green polices, but they lack resources to transition without economic loss. The world yet expects developing nations to “go green” while developed countries continue benefiting them from their industrial past. War, Economic control, and Global Governance keep underdeveloped countries trapped in a cycle of dependency on richer nations. Meanwhile green polices impose strict regulation that slow industrial growth in poor countries while the investments in climate friendly industries favors wealthy nations, leaving underdeveloped countries struggling to modernize the most. The new “Green Industrial Revolution” is just another economic barrier that prevents true equality in global development.


In summary, climate change is undoubtedly a real problem which needs an urgent solutions but without suppressing the under developing countries, the way it is managed benefits some and traps others. Industrialization has shaped modern economics yet sustainability policies maybe another version of control over the under developed countries which is again an opportunity for colonialists. It is now the matter of fact that underdeveloped nation will remain underdeveloped unless global polices recognize their true unique challenges. What we need are just good leaders both inside and outside the countries. Now it remains the same question can we shift the burden to a single person or shall we go parallel to each other while maintaining the old statuesque

AdSense Advertisement
Advertisement
AdSense Advertisement
Advertisement

Comment / Reply From

AdSense Advertisement
Advertisement